|
Post by kathy on Aug 22, 2010 18:54:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MRS-PUREFOY on Aug 23, 2010 3:29:29 GMT -5
Loving the facial hair, as long as it dont get any longer. Wonder if he's growing a beard for his role in Camelot?
|
|
|
Post by althea on Aug 23, 2010 17:33:35 GMT -5
Nice find Kathy Thought you might prefer to see the piccies ......... Chastity, that's not a beard, James just hadn't shaved before the photos were taken
|
|
|
Post by kathy on Aug 23, 2010 18:30:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cat on Aug 23, 2010 19:51:32 GMT -5
Loving the facial hair, as long as it dont get any longer. Wonder if he's growing a beard for his role in Camelot? Yea, that's like a day's growth...
|
|
|
Post by althea on Aug 24, 2010 2:24:28 GMT -5
..................... .... ..........................
|
|
|
Post by MRS-PUREFOY on Aug 24, 2010 3:20:09 GMT -5
Chastity, that's not a beard, James just hadn't shaved before the photos were taken You know what i mean. Five ok clock shadow then, or whatever it's called?
|
|
evakub
Full Member
simply purefect
Posts: 413
|
Post by evakub on Aug 24, 2010 12:42:26 GMT -5
with James you never know.His beard is growing so fast and thick that when he doesn´t shave for two days we are all wondering if this is going to be a beard or not.The photo below always puzzles me.It is supposed to be shot on 15.march 2009 when he attended " The Age of stupid". wasn´t he shooting Philanthropist at this time?when it wrapped before that date it couldn´t be for long and molto rapido the beard.Must have been for some private purpose cause as we all know no beard when presenting Philanthropist. Uploaded with ImageShack.us
|
|
|
Post by althea on Aug 24, 2010 16:32:46 GMT -5
with James you never know.His beard is growing so fast and thick that when he doesn´t shave for two days we are all wondering if this is going to be a beard or not.The photo below always puzzles me.It is supposed to be shot on 15.march 2009 when he attended " The Age of stupid". wasn´t he shooting Philanthropist at this time?when it wrapped before that date it couldn´t be for long and molto rapido the beard.Must have been for some private purpose cause as we all know no beard when presenting Philanthropist. This sc/cap from Rome, only goes to prove how quickly James' beard grows, it would take most guys a fortnight to achieve ..
|
|
|
Post by kathy on Aug 24, 2010 21:07:03 GMT -5
with James you never know.His beard is growing so fast and thick that when he doesn´t shave for two days we are all wondering if this is going to be a beard or not.The photo below always puzzles me.It is supposed to be shot on 15.march 2009 when he attended " The Age of stupid". wasn´t he shooting Philanthropist at this time?when it wrapped before that date it couldn´t be for long and molto rapido the beard.Must have been for some private purpose cause as we all know no beard when presenting Philanthropist. I This sc/cap from Rome, only goes to prove how quickly James' beard grows, it would take most guys a fortnight to achieve .. I guess sometimes James just can't be bothered shaving. That Rome photo, with the beard, drives me wild and draws more attention to those sensuous lips, which I would give up a months pension to kiss Bloody hell I've gone all thingy again
|
|
|
Post by MRS-PUREFOY on Aug 25, 2010 3:39:14 GMT -5
Urgh cant stand beards, and i bet it stinks of Marlborough lights. Mind you i would still give him a snog.
|
|
|
Post by kathy on Aug 26, 2010 18:39:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by althea on Aug 27, 2010 16:41:46 GMT -5
Thanks for this Kath, the last paragraph from James about Solomon Kane is interesting. So the producers own the rights, which is why the US don't have a distribution deal!! Wonder how that will be resolved
|
|
|
Post by kathy on Aug 27, 2010 19:16:46 GMT -5
Thanks for this Kath, the last paragraph from James about Solomon Kane is interesting. So the producers own the rights, which is why the US don't have a distribution deal!! Wonder how that will be resolved Don't know if it will, I didn't realise that either and apparently studios don't like producers owning the rights to a movie. Sure hope it does get resolved because they may not go ahead with the sequels if it's not!
|
|
|
Post by althea on Aug 28, 2010 3:11:31 GMT -5
Thanks for this Kath, the last paragraph from James about Solomon Kane is interesting. So the producers own the rights, which is why the US don't have a distribution deal!! Wonder how that will be resolved Don't know if it will, I didn't realise that either and apparently studios don't like producers owning the rights to a movie. Sure hope it does get resolved because they may not go ahead with the sequels if it's not! Is Michael a producer, he must be? He's as stubborn as James when it comes to getting things 'right', with regards to sequels, I can't imagine M relinquishing any decisions of that nature to a studio
|
|